Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lepakshi Degree College
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:20, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lepakshi Degree College[edit]
- Lepakshi Degree College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Un-referenced article on a minor junior college. Web search turned up no reliable sources. Appears not to meet notability guidelines. Whoosit (talk) 17:48, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: would consider merging with Sri Venkateswara University, which the article claims the college is affiliated to, but can find no reliable source to back this claim. --Whoosit (talk) 17:51, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - degree-awarding institutions are notable. Asian educational institutions have a notoriously poor Internet presence and searches need to be carried out for local sources. TerriersFan (talk) 19:20, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I agree Asian universities are underrepresented. But it's arguable whether all degree granting institutions are notable. Nor should they be included just because they're Asian. If you can track down sources I'd be pleased to withdraw the AfD and integrate them myself, but arguing WP:STUFFSHOULDEXIST doesn't address the problem that nothing on the page is verifiable. --Whoosit (talk) 21:37, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.