Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leoville Town Square

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (I think there are roughly 6.5 billion people who've never heard of this.) Grand master ka 21:47, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leoville Town Square[edit]

Website fails the WP:WEB criteria; Alexa ranking of 240,358 [1]. Possibly also redirect to Leo Laporte instead.--TBCTaLk?!? 03:12, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Who hasn't heard of this site before? Alternatively, Merge into Leo Laporte Article. — Joshua Johaneman 03:56, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 04:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep keep or merge per Joshua Johaneman Collaborate 05:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I, for one, had never heard of this web site before. And looking for sources from which an encyclopaedia article can be built, I see that I'm not alone. This web site garners a couple of incidental mentions, such as this, on some web logs, and that's it. It fails to satisfy the WP:WEB criteria, as the nominator says. No-one has actually documented it at all outside of Wikipedia. Documenting it inside Wikipedia would therefore be original research. Delete. Uncle G 09:07, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

*Merge into Leo Laporte it is his forums afterall. - Mike Beckham 09:34, 25 September 2006 (UTC) Changed to Delete user keeps adding spam and promotional material from the podcast. Obviously article is just a home for spam now. - Mike Beckham 02:31, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable website that fails WP:WEB, per nom. As an aside to answer the rhetorical question, I for one haven't heard of this site. That said, it doesn't matter if anyone has or has not heard of it. It matters whether it's encyclopedic, which it's not. Agent 86 19:08, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Delete the logo and screenshot images, too. --- RockMFR 20:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.