Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leopold Zerr

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leopold Zerr[edit]

Leopold Zerr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A well-written article about someone who turns out to lack the necessary notability for an article. The only source about Zerr is an obituary in the Catholic Herald, basically a newspaper from his employer (so not independent), and even then this is short, and mentions his music in one sentence.[1] There are no other sources about Zerr, his music, or other aspects of his life; e.g. the book about Henri Leclercq doesn't mention Zerr[2], and neither does the Religious Persecution one[3]. He gets a very passing mention in the Catholic Archives[4] and an equally passing mention in the Caecilia [5]. And that's it.[6] Fram (talk) 09:28, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 09:28, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 09:28, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 09:28, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 09:28, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Standard WP:GNG failure. SK2242 (talk) 11:55, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Rather puff-ish piece about a non-notable musician. Oaktree b (talk) 16:52, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - although articles like this make me sad to cast this vote. Well-written article, about an interesting historical character. Unfortunately they simply do not meet WP's notably criteria as per WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. Onel5969 TT me 01:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.