Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Burnett Tailor Made

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Leo Burnett Worldwide. Overwhelming consensus to merge. (non-admin closure) AmericanAir88^(talk) 15:28, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Leo Burnett Tailor Made[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The content is fine here but it should all be merged to Leo Burnett Worldwide. Lots of companies have satellite offices in multiple countries. This organization is one satellite of the main company. Whatever this company does is under the global brand.

To compare, companies like Google, etc, have offices in every country but Wikipedia still has one article Google.

Thanks to Sdkb for setting this up. I advocate that all sources and content be kept, just put in the parent article which is short, gets more traffic, and can assimilate all of this. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:09, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:09, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Agree with what is written above. No need to have its own page. MaskedSinger (talk) 14:24, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as I already suggested on the talk page, is the best option. Theroadislong (talk) 15:39, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. To clarify, I created the page as a redirect; other editors deserve credit for the content since added to it. - Sdkb (talk) 16:18, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Leo Burnett Worldwide but merge selectively. We don't need overblown controversy we just read in today's news crammed verbatim into other articles per WP:RECENTISM & WP:NOTEVERYTHING. --Animalparty! (talk) 19:02, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So these articles should have all been merged and redirected to one article? Peter James (talk) 21:23, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - Agree with the nomination. Spyder212 (talk) 14:50, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as per nom, which is to say WP:CHAIN. -Lopifalko (talk) 10:45, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as per nor. But please delete that photo of the guy with blue jacket. Chongkian (talk) 09:07, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.