Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lenny Pelling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 20:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lenny Pelling[edit]

This article was nominated for speedy by an IP based on a lack of notability. I agree it may be of questionable notability, however I was not convinced that it immediately met the criteria for speedy deletion, so brought it here. SGGH ^speak! 09:36, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No sources other than own website.--DerRichter (talk) 10:06, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If other references are required, then I am more than happy to provide them. http://www.artsconnect.com.au/artists/illustrators/lennypelling.htm AND http://www.bookdesign.com.au/text.php?page=lenny have the artist listed, and I feel that the article establishes notability sufficently. I am surprised that it sat for so long unnoticed if there was a problem with it. I hope this evidence of other reference points lays the matter to rest. Waterloo8618:45,11 February 2008 (UTC)
Weak Delete I'd love to be saying keep, but the assertions in the article don't seem to match up to reality. In addition WP:OR for a policy based reason. Pedro : Chat 00:45, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 00:40, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.