Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lemote

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:13, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lemote[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The previous AfD in 2008 had two weak keep votes. I cannot find sufficient independent reliable coverage for this to pass WP:GNG. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 07:40, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The article needs a lot of work, no doubt. Yet there still seems to be a considerable amount of coverage of this Chinese company's various business efforts and their products: here from the MIT Technology Review, here from OS News, and here from the Chinese Review are just three examples. I don't think that this article should be deleted. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 09:34, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 09:54, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 09:54, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 09:54, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Lemote were a significant player in the effort to keep the MIPS architecture alive and relevant in small-formfactor computers. Their activity has ramifications in related areas including netbooks, Qemu etc. MarkMLl (talk) 08:11, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as this seems acceptable. SwisterTwister talk 22:00, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.