Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lemon Bay / Myakka Trail Scenic Highway

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete with no prejudice against recreating per the comments below. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 13:31, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lemon Bay / Myakka Trail Scenic Highway[edit]

Lemon Bay / Myakka Trail Scenic Highway (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Copyied and pasted from this page. Content from Florida state government is PD, but it is not entirely clear that the government (Florida DOT in this case) actually published the site. Also, PD is not a license to copy without attribution. All diffs of the page contain the offending text, so deletion and recreation without the plagiarism is the best recourse. –Fredddie 03:06, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and recreate a non-plagiarized version of this article. The content is notable enough for its own article. Dough4872 01:29, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --AdmrBoltz 19:11, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree, delete and recreate—the topic should have an article, but this isn't the way to go about it. CSD G12 would apply if it weren't for the ambiguity over FDOT's role in creating the website that was copied here. (I agree that even if we didn't have that ambiguity, the content needs attribituion, but that would be easily resolved.) Imzadi 1979  02:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.