Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lele Pons (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Spartaz ^Humbug! 10:06, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lele Pons[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since this articles last deletion request, not much has changed. The article is of extremely poor quality. "Her favorite color is green" and I believe that the person is simply not notable enough. If all info that is unnecessary is removed it would probably only consist of an infobox. Rayukk (talk) 21:07, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 21:31, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She seems to have gotten some substantial coverage from legitimate media sources. I agree that the article contains too much unnecessary trivia, although this is best fixed through editing, not deletion. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 23:26, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've removed a lot of the unnecessary trivia from the article, including the information about her favorite color being green. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 23:33, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:58, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:59, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Coverage of trivia v trivial coverage? It's easy to confuse the two here. Jacona (talk) 11:45, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article previously contained coverage of trivia such as information about Pons' favorite color, her pets, her favorite fandoms, ect. She has gotten some substantial coverage in reliable sources, so I do not believe that trivial coverage is an issue. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:40, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:38, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deadbeef 04:00, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – per Spirit of Eagle. At least some of the sources are RS. Teen Vogue has an article. And how can someone with 5 million followers not be notable? – Margin1522 (talk) 08:49, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ceradon (talk • contribs) 05:44, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.