Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leger Holidays

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. One of the delete votes is "weak", but there seems to be consensus that the coverage is not enough to satisfy WP:NCORP. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:25, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Leger Holidays[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company, Fails NCORP & GNG. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 14:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete (WP:A7) per Nomination above. The page contains inaccuracies and without in-line citations, nothing can be verified - not that there are any significant reliable sources to check anyway. WP:Snow applies. Exemplo347 (talk) 17:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As there's about 2 or 3 useable sources I didn't believe A7 really applied but ofcourse if you wanna A7 it I have no objections, Thanks. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 18:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

weak Delete There are plenty of name-drops and anecdotes involving the company, but most of the detailed stuff fails WP:ORGDEPTH for being generic reviews or routine business listings. I found [1], which isn't from a great source (Daily Mail) but does go into the company a bit. So, I'm leaning delete, but willing to be persuaded otherwise (since I might have missed something). Primefac (talk) 16:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.