Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legend racing deaths

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. As observed below: "This is just a more subjective duplicate of Driver deaths in motorsport." No chance of another judgment here. postdlf (talk) 23:07, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Legend racing deaths[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deciding which drivers are "legends" doesn't follow the neutral point of view policy. What I consider to be a legendary racing driver is different than what someone else would. Royal broil 15:02, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – per nom, plus all this information is already available in other, similar, more neutrally-constructed articles. Bretonbanquet (talk) 15:26, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This is just a more subjective duplicate of Driver deaths in motorsport. Zappa 24 Mati 15:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Requires us to subjectively identify people as "legends", which is definitely not within the scope of our duties. WP:POV WP:OR Even if we were to change the article to something less subjective, like "Deaths of race car drivers dubbed 'Legends' by XYZ magazine, it would still be a weird article of dubious academic purpose." Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:24, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The selection criteria is inherently subjective. Driver deaths in motorsport is the appropriate place for information about such deaths. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 22:51, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.