Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leg! Fashion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete after discounting IP addresses and single-purpose accounts which failed to explain how the supposed notability of this term is verifiable. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 18:43, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leg! Fashion[edit]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Prodded as an advertisement, tag removed by anon IP without explanation so bringing it here as per policy. Company appears to be relatively new, no opinon from me. DrunkenSmurf 15:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Delete, I agree, the word itself is becoming increasingly popular - i have heard it from complete srangers personally - so i think this 'cult' is certainly worthy of a page Fillup 06:17, 10 September 2006 (UTC) -- note: this is the creator of the article DrunkenSmurf 14:58, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete, Company does not seem to be selling anything, more of a slang term becoming popular in New Zealand. Stunt sausage 06:18, 10 September 2006 (UTC) note: users only edits are to this AfD -- DrunkenSmurf 14:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-- note: I have only recently started wiki, have made several edits since then Stunt sausage 11:47, 11 September 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Delete, as spam. I'm sure they're nice people though. Jefffire 15:40, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not at all notable, even in the fashion industry. Akradecki 16:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete, Extremely popular slang term, used by the majority of Auckland University Students. heather 23:40, 11 September 2006 (UTC) note: users only edit is to this AfD -- DrunkenSmurf 13:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The company itself does not yet appear to meet the requirements of WP:CORP, and the section on "Popular usage" is completely unsourced and thus fail WP:V. --Satori Son 14:30, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete I came here from trademe looking for a definition of the word-i couldn't find it elsewhere so i turned to my favourite knowledgebase! Perhaps the company info should be removed, and the word itself preserved? 203.109.223.97 03:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete I am now using this word in everyday spoken text and the fact that other likeminded people understand it surely means that it is becoming more than just slang.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.