Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee So-jung

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ladies' Code, preferable to deletion.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:21, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lee So-jung[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Singer with questionable notability. I am finding some pages that have the same name, but not sure if it is the same person (on another note-I think this has been afd before under another name, but not 100% sure) Wgolf (talk) 20:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 20:54, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 21:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't believe she has enough independent notability, per WP:BAND and WP:ENT. Her only individual activities are reaching the Top 8 in The Voice of Korea and a 2-episode appearance on King of Mask Singer. (I don't think this page has ever been created before.) Random86 (talk) 21:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete should have been PRODed as a BLP with no sources. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have the linguistic ability to investigate independent notability myself, but if this is not kept as a separate article then it should certainly be redirected to Ladies' Code, so I don't see the need for a deletion discussion. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 18:11, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ladies' Code. There is hardly any solo-coverage about her. (One of the best is this). Every single source mentions her in the context of the band Ladies' Code. Considering that notability is not inherited, redirecting is the best option as of now. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:19, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect as still questionable for own article and keeping it available is vulnerable to restarting again, I'm not confident this is going to be acceptable anytime soon thus Delete altogether. SwisterTwister talk 22:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ladies' Code: Per discussion by IP User 86.17.222.157. Tibbydibby (talk) 01:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.