Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Pletzers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 18:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Pletzers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Books are self published or small press (Smashwords, Triskaideka Books, Dark Continents , BBS Press, Writers Press LTD, Panic Press UK [1]) and lack reviews. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:49, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:35, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:35, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nbook, a book must have a number of sales, reviews, coverage, references, homages to be notable, thus this book fails these issues. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 19:38, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per AUTHOR #3, books don't have multiple reviews in reliable sources. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 21:02, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:49, 14 November 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.