Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Cruz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:22, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Cruz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sold on the notability here. Minor-league player fails WP:ATHLETE, and the sources don't quite seem to pass GNG. Wizardman 23:51, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 00:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Independent baseball player... Has some Division II accomplishments in college but D2 gets even less mainstream coverage than D1 does. Spanneraol (talk) 02:56, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep The Baseball Player of the Year honor seems semi-notable. Alex (talk) 04:39, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- No, it's not. Reliable sources are what makes something notable, and there aren't enough here. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:29, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Which is why we used to keep articles on the basis of "they made multiple minor league All-Star teams". Righhhhht. Alex (talk) 18:02, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - "Used to". That was an error that has been corrected in the AfD process, yourself notwithstanding. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:38, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources don't establish WP:GNG. This source is the best there is and I wouldn't call it in depth. With a bunch of deep pieces, it would be notable, but those don't exist. I'm surprised this passed WP:AFC. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:29, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable.--Yankees10 18:55, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.