Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LearnSignal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 23:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LearnSignal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NCORP and WP:PROMO. Non-noteable business with a lack of significant coverage in independent secondary sources.Digging into the citations, they are suspect at best. The company has only been around for a year, and while it is great they have received silver and gold approval levels as a learning partner, those awards do not immediately qualify the company for its own WP page. Comatmebro (talk) 20:14, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – After searches, not finding enough coverage to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Note that this source in the article is essentially pr, and other sources are rather routine in nature. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:52, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.