Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leader-1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of original GoBots. The sourcing to Time magazine doesn't satisfy GNG, just so you know. (non-admin closure) ミラ P 17:06, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Leader-1[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional character TTN (talk) 15:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 15:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 15:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 15:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now. I feel this article just needs a bit of cleanup, it has sources which include TIME magazine among others. Was there a WP:BEFORE check done for sources? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:58, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unable to read the Time source, but it seems like fluff considering it's used to reference a basic fact about the character. That's the same for everything else. If they have anything of substance, the person who added them certainly didn't feel like showing it. TTN (talk) 16:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I understand for TIME, but have you searched for additional sources before the nomination or checked out the ones present? Its easy to say that something isn't notable, but you have to show how this is true per WP:BEFORE "D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability". - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:15, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The Time mentions seem to be in passing and/or related to press-release like or their rewrites short description of toys. Nothing here suggests notability, fails WP:NFICTION and WP:NORG (which covers products like toys). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:20, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of original GoBots, which is the most notable version within the fiction. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:47, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:06, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, WP:NFICTION. Or redirect to List of original GoBots. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:53, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.