Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leśni

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Polish resistance. This AFD discussion is all over the map but I'm going to close it with the suggestion to transform the title into a redirect as an ATD. Should good sources appear in the future, the article can be recovered and improved. Liz Read! Talk! 04:18, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leśni[edit]

Leśni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article (which is a target of the Polish partisans redirect) hasn't been significantly improved in 15 years, and arguably is an WP:OR-ish treatment of a concept of Polish non-urban resistance in World War II. It does not have a Polish interwiki, and my search for the term "leśni" did not find any SIGCOV; I located two Polish scholarly article using the term in the title but a search within them did not show that they even discuss it in the body, The only properly referenced sentence (book with page number) was added by me long time ago (I just merged it to a relevant article); the other referenced part (books without page numbers) is a summary of the story of Henryk Dobrzański. In this sorry state I am afraid the article has issues with OR/V, and as a treatment of the Polish non-urban WWII resistance, it's so poor it merits WP:TNT. The best WP:ATD I can think of is to redirect this to Polish resistance, as Polish partisans in forests existed in other periods too (and in fact the two Polish scholarly articles are found talk about post-WWII era cursed soldiers anyway). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:23, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there are two different proposed redirects.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:54, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.