Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ldirectord

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ldirectord[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing at all convincing for the applicable notability and my searches found several links Books, News and Highbeam so far but there's nothing noticeably better. SwisterTwister talk 04:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Non-notable Linux service application. Chrisw80 (talk) 19:14, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable and does not have any sources. Tom29739 ^[talk] 20:23, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG by a mile.—azuki (talk · contribs · email) 22:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.