Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lazuli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 22:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lazuli[edit]

Hoax? In any case he is not notable. Ezeu 00:35, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Lapis lazuli, as it seems like a legitimate search term for that. As for the current subject, even if he is real, non-notable and probably fails WP:MUSIC. --Kinu 00:41, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:MUSIC horribly. Royboycrashfan 01:00, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:MUSIC - redirect would not be proper in this case. --M @th wiz 2020 01:07, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not a ~~noteable~~ notable artist. Section9 02:06, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect per the above. Dbtfz (talk - contribs) 02:54, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn .Blnguyen 05:35, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Kinu MLA 10:42, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable musician. --Ter e nc e Ong (恭喜发财) 11:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Kinu. And good luck being a complete isolationist. It wont get you on Wikipedia, or anywhere else for that matter. Grandmasterka 12:55, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect per Kinu. The number of genuinely notable artists with myspace pages is, by common consent, negligible. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 12:58, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, people could search for the search term so it should exist, but simply redirect it to the proper article. Elfguy 13:34, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:MUSIC Death Eater Dan 19:21, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Avi 21:30, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't meet WP notable FloNight 03:15, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. — Indi ^{[ talk ]} 22:43, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.