Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lazar Carević

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 02:48, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lazar Carević[edit]

Lazar Carević (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 12:50, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm just gonna copy the previous PRODs here for reference:
  1. 19:30, 9 April 2019 Explicit talk contribs deleted page Lazar Carević (Expired PROD, concern was: Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY, never played in a WP:FPL) (thank)
  2. 19:21, 10 July 2020 Fenix down talk contribs deleted page Lazar Carević (Expired PROD, concern was: Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.) (thank)
Obviously the first PROD should have made the article ineligible to a second PROD but this one slipped through the cracks once. Ben · Salvidrim!  15:00, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 20:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTY. Paul Vaurie (talk) 00:18, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep: He fails WP:NFOOTY, but I believe a conversation might be worth having re: WP:GNG. There seem to be a LOT of non-English language results out there, most of which coincide with his move to/time with Barcelona. I found this in English, which I'd imagine is based from this article. There are also all of the following articles re: his time there like this, this, this, this, this, this, this, and this which I think starts to build a case that he's covered at least in part by a pretty broad spectrum of non-English speaking sources, although I could also see some claim it as WP:ROUTINE. GauchoDude (talk) 17:33, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A number of sources have been suggested which warrant further consideration. Feels like WP:BLP1E at the moment as they all refer to the same thing, but at least indicative of some level of coverage.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 22:38, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting one more time to see if anyone has any thoughts on the sources presented by GauchoDude.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 23:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.