Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laws of attraction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:23, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Laws of attraction[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is essentially a disambiguation page in disguise, covering a multitude of "laws" in all sorts of different fields, all of which are unrelated. The largest section of this page "history", is simply a listing of all people who theorized about repulsion or attraction of pretty much anything. Ysangkok (talk) 15:26, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is not a single topic, but a list of unrelated laws. Margalob (talk) 19:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is conflating laws from different disciplines that have no relationship to each other. This is probably acceptable in some pseudoscience belief systems, but this doesn't mean anything on Wikipedia because it is essentially equal to gibberish. -----Steve Quinn (talk) 05:06, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems to be an original essay, which like mentioned, conflates wildly different things. Mr. Magoo (talk) 12:59, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.