Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence Siegel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence Siegel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability besides a single composition. The composition itself doesn't seem notable after a cursory glance. At best, it should just be a page about the composition. References are very slim and from what I saw, the only one used is the only one out there. I prodded it a bit ago and the author simply removed it without improving the article. Jcmcc (Talk) 06:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep an oratorio on the holocaust recorded by a major orchestra and distributed by Naxos is obviously notable as press coverage indicates. So http://lawrencesiegel.com/works-of-lawrence-siegel/ haven't had more than local press coverage. It happens. Moving a composer page to a composition page is just asking for more work later. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:42, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If the work is notable, then it should have a page about the work itself with a mention about the producer at the most. Jcmcc (Talk) 09:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No reliable, independent sources to establish notability. It appears that he has released Kaddish through Naxos, according to Naxos' own website, but he needs two or more albums through a major record label. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 12:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability for him nor for his work, a couple of lines in an obscure magazine are not enough, fails GNG, ANYBIO or other suitable SNGs. Cavarrone 06:54, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.