Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law PreDiscovery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Soft delete, minding low participation. A redirect could potentially be warranted if secondary sourcing on the connection is added to the LN article. czar ⨹ 19:17, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Law PreDiscovery[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient evidence to support notability; Google searches only return press releases and company sales pages. Primefac (talk) 23:17, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 23:41, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge — The creator of this article, Elephant 16, proposed merging this article with LexisNexis (the creator of the tool described in the article) a week ago on the talk page for the nominated article. Why is this even at AfD? —mako ๛ 23:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there's nothing in the article worth merging, not a single reliable third-party source that mentions the product. I haven't found any sources beyond a passing mention of less than one sentence and a few rather dubious blogs. That's not enough to establish the software's notability; nor is it enough to merge any of the current content elsewhere. Huon (talk) 00:45, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:35, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹ 05:17, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.