Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurie Wallace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 04:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Laurie Wallace[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The notability of the subject, and the verifiability of the sources, has been repeatedly questioned. I am bringing this to AfD with the hope that a consensus will be reached on whether this article should stay or go. Inniverse (talk) 22:16, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because she's hot Delete The sources are a student newspaper, a primary source, and a site tagged as possibly unreliable. Searches turned up no reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:11, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Former porn star turned promoter. Based upon the sources in the article, and the lack of any coverage by non-genre sources, this one will likley be deleted. Does anyhone know whether or not the archived Eros source in the article[1] might be an online version of the Eros magazine published by Ralph Ginzburg? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:01, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree that coverage by student newspapers are probably not enough to establish notability. Neither is the Eros website, which is a promotional site for escorts. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:14, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.