Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurie Buchanan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:52, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Laurie Buchanan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

sigh We find ourselves at AFD again because of a non-notable YouTuber. Those who shall not be named feel that co-forming a notable band makes one notable, but when INHERITED is looked at (as well as a complete and utter lack of substantial GNews or GSearch hits) that claim is utterly refuted. Fails most of our metrics, but mostly GNG and MUSICBIO. Primefac (talk) 01:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Aaron Buchanan per WP:INVALIDBIO. Adam9007 (talk) 01:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:44, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:44, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Being the sister of a questionably notable person and a member of a non-notable band does not satisfy any criteria on Wikipedia. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:55, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:49, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete INVALIDBIO does not say we have to redirect articles to their relatives. It says that some titles redirect to famous relatives. There are valid reasons to not redirect. In this case, we have one borderline notable person who has a sister that is clearly not notable. The redirect is unlikely to be used, and in my mind, redirects from one BLP to another should probably be used sparingly. Since there is not a good reason to redirect here, and the individual doesn't meet our inclusion criteria, deletion is the best option. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:05, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.