Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurent Besencon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 02:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Laurent Besencon[edit]
- Laurent Besencon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A procedural nomination as this article was deleted by WP:PROD in December, recreated and prodded again. I have declined the second prod to bring it here. The rationale for deletion on the prod was "Not verifiable, not notable, no sources from Google or Google News. His clients are famous and notable, not him." Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence of notability. Pages of MySpace-like hits on Google, zero hits on Google News. Bongomatic 20:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:32, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Clearly a case of self-promotion. LSD (talk) 00:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unable to find any sources to establish notability. Maralia (talk) 03:43, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:13, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete = The Prod was mine, so I of course agree with the reasoning. :) My research shows that there are no real references for him. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 07:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.