Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurence Moskowitz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:35, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Laurence Moskowitz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability criteria. Charlie the Pig (talk) 04:11, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The video news release was a significant development in the Communications world and Moskowitz (and his now-defunct Medialink) played a large role in developing the technology. A quick search of the PR Week archives substantiates that claim. I'm willing to work on an article rewrite, provided that I can track down the PR Week "10 Most Influential Public Relations Executives of the 20th Century" piece mentioned here, as well as on his Bloomberg page. I've already been able to verify his Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year Award here and should be able to verify the rest. Strombollii (talk) 17:37, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 14:40, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep if at all because of the Ernst & Young Award as aside from that, probably more delete for now, because there seems to be no better coverage (mostly PR related of course) and some of the best results I found were this. SwisterTwister talk 22:11, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Swarm ♠ 04:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.