Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurence Benson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete G7 by Edgar181. (non-admin closure) RMHED (talk) 22:18, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Laurence Benson[edit]

Non-notable; notability is not inherited. Gromlakh (talk) 19:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Saving one's allowance isn't notable unless it makes the Times or other media outlet. Such is not the case here. DarkAudit (talk) 20:42, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I am sure that you are totally unaware of him, he is a know figure in London. I think that rather than not being a suitable article it is infact your lake of awareness that lets you to believe that this is not pointless. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cricketking (talk • contribs) 00:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Cricketking is the article's author. Gromlakh (talk) 05:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - simply being known is insufficient. I looked for reliable sources, and found articles for people named "Laurence Benson", but they don't appear to be the subject of this article. -- Whpq (talk) 17:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NN. Possible speedy - after being told not to remove the AfD tag, the author blanked the page. It was immediately unblanked by an over-enthusiastic vandal-hunter; but the blanking should allow a speedy A7. JohnCD (talk) 10:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.