Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Willey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Double Take (group). Will protect Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:51, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lauren Willey[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced. All sources located only connect this person to their short-lived music group. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. Also WP:NOTINHERITED. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Obviously a fan page for a non-notable entertainer at the start of their student career. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR, WP:CREATIVE, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:BASIC. I don't know if it meets Speedy Delete criteria, but it is completely unsourced/unreferenced and seems like WP:OR. Netherzone (talk) 15:52, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per WP:BURDEN, the continued re-addition of uncited material is considered disruptive editing. As per nom and Netherzone, meets none of the SNG's or GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:12, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are not enough sources to meet WP:NACTOR. Gritmem (talk) 17:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked for WP:UPE. MER-C 19:42, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The Simple English Wikipedia page is also up for deletion (discussion). Some of the points mentioned may also apply to your article. Eptalon (talk) 17:43, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There doesn't appear to be any sources that I can find that show they pass GNG. -DJSasso (talk) 18:35, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Except for the short period with the girl-group (which we don't discuss here), I can't find sources for her claimed acts, for example singing in 'Les Miserables'. Looking on Google, there's a little social media, but not much usable material. If Lauren Willey really was the singer claimed, I'd at least expect a role: 'Sang Young Cosette in L.M.' (thats a treble, usually sung by a child) - If the article is kept, the Biography section needs rewriting for neutrality. As it is, Willey may be notable as part of the short-lived band; I don't see notabilty of her as a single person, especially as there are no sources for the different claimed parts. Eptalon (talk) 20:14, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NMUSIC & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 20:23, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I should note I am ok with a protected redirect as well. -DJSasso (talk) 13:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

+1 - I too am fine with a redirect. –Davey2010^Talk 21:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hah just realized I replied to yours and not mine like I meant to. -DJSasso (talk) 14:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restore redirect to Double Take (group) and protect. The current article is incoherent, including among other things what appears to be a quote from an unidentified review of some other person's performance: "While she's text-book perfect for Anna, with her young, light and angelic voice, there's always been something about Einat's performance preventing me from really loving her in that role, though i'm not sure what it is." This article isn't about anyone named Einat. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 23:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Restore redirect to Double Take (group) and protect per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion. I was unable to find substantial coverage about the subject.
Lauren Willey has existed as a redirect to Double Take (musical duo) or Double Take (group) since 2012 until 2021 when there were multiple attempts to create an article that were correctly reverted. Cunard (talk) 10:07, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article lacks any references.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:34, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable Spudlace (talk) 06:24, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Restore redirect to Double Take (group) and protect - we should always consider WP:ATD and we have a clear one here. Obviously not independently notable. Protecting the redirect will stop the disruptive attempts to restore what is currently a BLP violation. In the unlikely event that she does become notable, the protection can always be undone by following the proper channels. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:37, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – not notable; redirect unnecessary as other than the target for the redirect, the only link to this article is from an article for one song (Hot Problems) which appears to be the only reason for any claim to notability (WP:1E), but that, along with the group itself, is of dubious notability, imo. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 16:56, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree that the redirect is unnecessary, and that the song and group are of doubtful notability as well. Netherzone (talk) 18:39, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Salt, fails GNG, and redirect would've been helpful and cheap but I don't think it is necessary here. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 16:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.