Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Scruggs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clearly, the keeps have the numbers, and even an argument or two. With thanks to the nominator for their crisp prose and sturdy argument, and with thanks to Bearian for striking the note of tragedy. Drmies (talk) 17:37, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lauren Scruggs[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Strikes me as a clear example of BLP1E. She got married to a person who possible passes the GNG, but that's what the coverage I've seen is about. In other words, not independently notable. Drmies (talk) 19:46, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - news stories over three year's time period. She's in the category: famous for being famous. Bearian (talk) 20:49, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Bearian's got it spot on. — RockMFR 01:56, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn't meet GNG.Jacona (talk) 01:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep/comment Hmmm. In addition to the ongoing coverage, I see this extensive coverage in a recent book, albeit a certain type of God Is Good book. My feeling is she just about passes GNG, even though the omngoiing coverage over the last few years ultimately boils down to the one WP:SINGLEEVENT. Mabalu (talk) 09:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.