Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Razavi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:12, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lauren Razavi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An IP tagged this for deletion using {{delete}} with the following rationale "this does not warrant a wikipedia article as the individual is in no way notable - this is a self-made wikipedia page designed to help the career of a jobbing student journalist."

I didn't think it was quite bad enough to delete via G11 or A7 so decided to bring it here. Apart from the two interviews in poor quality sources that are already included in the article I can't find anything written about her so it appears to fail WP:BIO. SmartSE (talk) 18:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:WRITER. No substantial reviews of her work, no indication of her importance/significance/innovation as a writer, no major prizes, and I can't find any in-depth WP:GNG-style coverage. Some of the claims to fame are very desperate (e.g. she was thanked in liner notes by a band, whose article she created). Nomination is accurate. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:07, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- NN as yet. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:35, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.