Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurel Near (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:37, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Laurel Near[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable in all respects. Quis separabit? 17:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not even close to WP:NACTOR. One notable film role, nothing else going for it crh23 (talk) 21:37, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fails NACTOR as well as GNG, The BLP was featured on the Homepage but it's just a mention and as far as I'm aware articles don't get kept because they've been on homepage?, Anyway delete. –Davey2010^Talk 21:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not better satisfying WP:ENTERTAINER. SwisterTwister talk 04:05, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:00, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.