Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Mohiuddin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:14, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Mohiuddin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mohiuddin was involved in running a charity named Infolady, which is the subject of most of the sourced provided. None of them contain any sustained coverage of her person. Much is also non independent. Since I haven't been able to locate any significant coverage in third-party sources myself, I don't see her meeting WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Modussiccandi (talk) 20:07, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 20:07, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 20:07, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 20:07, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is coverage in renowned independent news organizations such as Aljazeera, France24 and Philanthropy Age. These coverages explicitly include and refer to Mohiuddin. Besides these, the Infolady Model has achieved numerous local and international awards. Some of them are the Bob's award (Infolady wins Bobs award | The Daily Star), Manthanaward (E-AGRICULTURE & LIVELIHOOD, Winner 2011 – Manthan Award). Targeting the Ultra Poor Program is also an award winning program of BRAC (largest NGO in the world). Kindly help improve the article, but deletion, I believe, is not a constructive solution. The article just contains objective information, not trying to promote any person or organization, citing proper authentic references. J1477 (talk) 07:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure we're on the same page yet: I believe that there is no significant (that is, focussed and in-depth) coverage of her biography available. You say that the coverage of Infolady 'includes and refers' to Mohiuddin. This is true, but we are looking for more than mentions. If you're not sure what I mean by significant coverage, have a look at WP:SIGCOV. It seems you're trying to make the case for Infolady's notability — that is not what I'm quibbling about. Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 09:05, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infolady is a notable award winning model, there is no doubt about that. It doesn't require further promotion. I have added further information as to her accomplishments as Head of the program (they came out in news portals, her name was not mentioned) but it is apparent that she was the head of the program during that time (if we match the dates). She also contributed to BRAC's TUP Program, another award winning program, and BRAC is the largest NGO in the world. She also hosted BRAC's first every Hackathon. As a person who has so much philanthropic contribution in Bangladesh, she deserves to have a few lines on Wikipedia (and only lines that were mentioned in renowned news portals). Proof and credibility of her activities exist - but citing LinkedIn and other personal blogs would not be acceptable by Wikipedia. Hence only providing information (a few lines) that were cited in these news portals. Bottom line: She was head of the award winning infolady program, award winning TUP program, and during her tenure she made some noteworthy implementations. Kindly end the debate here. J1477 (talk) 11:47, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me, but I believe you do not yet understand how notability on Wikipedia works. Subjects generally need to have been covered in detail by two or more reliable and independent sources (WP:GNG). Even though you've written at length in favour of Mohiuddin's notably, you have failed to demonstrate that detailed, professional coverage of her exists. Coverage is what determines her notability, not whether she was involved with BRAC or any other charity. You saying that she 'deserves' to have a Wikipedia article does not change this. Of course, I'll be happy to review significant coverage of her once it's added to this discussion. Modussiccandi (talk) 12:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

J1477, AFD discussions last at least 7 days unless the nominator chooses to withdraw their nomination. This debate will last a few more days. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:11, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-per nom does not meet notability guidelines.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 05:26, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Other than some passing/trivial mentions, there is no WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 21:18, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The sources provided by J1477 are coverage of the Infolady program, not Laura Mohiuddin. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED and there isn't enough significant coverage to meet WP:BIO. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:41, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.