Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Lydall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:02, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Lydall[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion for non notable model. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Like the oft deleted Parnia Porsche she was part of a controversial advertising campaign but has no independent notability. Coverage is about that campaign or tabloid. Like that Porsche article this was created by an editor dedicated to promoting One individual and his business interests. The relevant business here is Ultra Tune, the business promoted in that advertising campaign. Pure PR. Probable UPE. See also fellow Ultra Tune model at afd Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyana Hansen. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:15, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:19, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:19, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:19, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:42, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:42, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable cover girl. WP:NMODEL #3. Wm335td (talk) 21:20, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see how she "Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment." Papaursa (talk) 20:52, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no siginificant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources - photo spreads are not significant coverage and interviews are not reliable sources - Epinoia (talk) 22:04, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:14, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per Epinoia. Rockphed (talk) 18:06, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. Barca (talk) 20:00, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The nom has made an excellent and detailed case. Appearing in a controversial ad campaign seems more a case of being notable for one event and a model appearing in a photo shoot seems like someone doing their job. The bottom line is that she doesn't meet the notability criteria for models and, like her admate Parnia Porsche, she fails WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 20:52, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yip. Entirely non-notable. scope_creep^Talk 08:50, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.