Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Larson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Yash^talk stalk 05:51, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Larson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

subject fails WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. Only primary unreliable sources could be found about the subject —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 07:47, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 07:48, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 07:48, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did some research before deciding on this one. I found good sources and added them. There is a mention in the New Yorker. There is a review on the Oregon Public Broadcasting site. Even better, a review in Artforum. A publication called "the New Replublic" saw fit to do a feature on one of her projects. Finally, a museum in New York called The Met has her in their permanent collection. I have never been to Metropolitan Museum of Art, but I hear it is quite a big deal and I hope to visit one day. Oh, Keep. 104.163.140.193 (talk) 08:42, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just added the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston to the permanent collections list. This means that with the Met collection included, she satisfies WP:ARTIST.104.163.140.193 (talk) 08:55, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: held in multiple major collections so passes WP:ARTIST. PamD 09:14, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: two major collections does it for me. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 09:27, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Maybe it's WP:TOOSOON but having her work at MOMA and the Whitney demonstrate that she has real promise! (Joking of course - except about the keep - she also meets GNG.) JSFarman (talk) 15:35, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Is this a snow keep? 104.163.140.193 (talk) 04:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Due to the corroborative work that has taken place. — O Fortuna!^{Imperatrix mundi.} 11:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment it's time to close or withdraw this. (formerly 104.163.140.193)96.127.243.41 (talk) 08:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.