Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Harling

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:08, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Harling[edit]

Laura Harling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable child actor, I can't identify any major roles which might suggest she received individual media attention. The article relies on IMDb and an awful lot of name-dropping. Sionk (talk) 05:40, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The actress seems to have only had small bit roles from what's been indicated within the article. Arguably the article may had sustained during her peak in the late 90s. Shallownotthou (talk) 05:58, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Harling has already had a long and successful career on stage and television and many of her roles cited in the article were leading ones. The article has largely been rewritten by Ssilvers to emphasise this. Jack1956 (talk) 08:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - A search of a news database shows other work (particularly stage work), including up to 2015, and from reliable mainstream press. Now added. - Gavin (talk) 09:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: In addition to an important career as a child actress, Harling has a very substantial stage and opera career as an adult, and a parallel career as a theatre and radio producer. -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep in view of the work that's been done on the article. Clearly a notable subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.224.27.228 (talk) 12:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.