Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Doherty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:34, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Doherty[edit]

Declined speedy/contested endorsed prod. Reasoning is that there are no reliable sources to support the article, and even if there were the two roles mentioned seem to have been very minor, her character in her one movie appearance is credited simply as "nurse". Fails notability guideline and is unverified. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:40, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:ENTERTAINER/WP:GNG and for being a poorly sourced BLP. Some sources about her participating in Pop Idol show, but no detailed biographical coverage. -PirateSmackK (talk) 17:45, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - one non-named role in a movie this year is not a reason for inclusion. Agree with all Beeble has to say. -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 18:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 18:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. —Beeblebrox (talk) 19:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note It may also be worth mentioning that previous nearly identical versions of this article were speedy deleted four separate times by four different admins. This should be salted if the outcome is to delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:07, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I think the fact that the entire filmography section consists of precisely one role, "a nurse" in a red-linked movie, is telling. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 17:20, 27 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.