Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Cosoi (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 06:45, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Cosoi[edit]

Laura Cosoi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for 8 years for notability, IMDb is the main reference, fails WP:GNG Theroadislong (talk) 09:25, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 09:38, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 09:38, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 09:38, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 09:38, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 09:38, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:35, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: fails WP:ENT / WP:BASIC. --K.e.coffman (talk) 13:52, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Many problems here... but notability is the main one. People really thought putting tables there would be a distraction from truth. Trillfendi (talk) 18:00, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, not shown to be notable for stand alone article; trivial. Kierzek (talk) 20:29, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.