Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Boersma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Boersma[edit]

Laura Boersma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article lacks any indepdent, reliable sources. All sources are either non-reliable or overly connected to Boersma. There is also no sense that her work rises to the level of notability. John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:08, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:45, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:45, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:10, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I think she's TOOSOON and hasn't done enough to get good critical reception. There's some hits in HighBeam, but they are mentions. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:00, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:18, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not notable, no third-party sources, minuscule filmography, and far too many red links in the article. Her one big effort (Fling) came and went nearly a decade ago, and has all of one review on Rotten Tomatoes. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 06:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.