Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Angel (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) MrKIA11 (talk) 14:19, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Angel[edit]

Unsourced BLP, either it should be sourced or deleted. RMHED (talk) 22:06, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appears someone sourced it very well over the last few minutes. It is very short (ie: a stub) that is never a reason to delete. this cite alone demonstrates notability beyond any doubt, as the award itself even has an article here. PHARMBOY ( moo ) ( plop ) 00:45, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:PORNBIO with verifiable FICEB wins. With thanks for improvements by Epbr123. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw article has now been stubbed and sourced so now has no real problems, this AfD can be closed. RMHED (talk) 03:42, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.