Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Allen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep with leave to speedy renominate. I think we're done here. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Allen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason Pinner458 (talk) 23:34, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i am almost positive that wikipedia has one actress listed as two seperate people, a Laura Allen and a Laura Harris http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Harris so i would appreciate if someone could somehow confirm the correct name and then delete the other one, IMDB has them listed as seperate people aswell so you may find it hard to prove..... anyway thanks

I think this is a joke, but if not then you are mistaken. Similar appearance and the same first name don't make them the same person. You can confirm that with their existing Wikipedia entries and completely different filmographies and biographies. Or verify at IMDB for Laura Harris and Laura Allen (SEC (talk) 01:44, 4 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Speedy close - There is no evidence provided that the two articles represent the same person, and even if they were, that would be a reason to WP:MERGE the articles. -- Whpq (talk) 14:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close. Completely groundless argument, independent referencing. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:23, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

close. They are not the same actress. Tangurena (talk) 15:24, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close of groundless nomination of notable subject. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:30, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.