Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Launch pad = SHAR (Sriharikota high altitude range)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:A10 of Satish Dhawan Space Centre Second Launch Pad which is the name of the launchpad. —SpacemanSpiff 20:33, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Launch pad = SHAR (Sriharikota high altitude range)[edit]

Launch pad = SHAR (Sriharikota high altitude range) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Launch pads are not necessarily notable. Eat me, I'm a red bean (discusscontribs) 11:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. No opinion as to the fundamental notability or lack thereof of launch pads in general. However, this article has a deeply defective title, essentially no content, and seems to be either duplicative of or in conflict with Satish Dhawan Space Centre Second Launch Pad, which also claims to have been the launch site for Chandrayaan-1 (given that it has references, I know which article I'd side with...). Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 21:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • NO VOTE: Just to let you all know this AFD is seriously malformatted and needs to be fixed. Quis separabit? 14:31, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The equal sign in the article title was breaking the {{la}} template that creates the header. I've escaped the equal sign, making the template happier. Nothing else is broken, I don't think. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 14:39, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.