Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laufer Film

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Laufer Film[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable minor production company. Article created by company itself, nad has no significant coverage in any reliable, news sources. Completely fails WP:COMPANY and WP:N -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 19:01, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Evil saltine (talk) 19:54, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 22:17, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:CORP, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 20:18, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Darrenhusted (talk) 21:19, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice toward recreation and allow article'e return if/when notability is met. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 09:25, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. LargoLarry (talk) 15:41, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.