Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lathan
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep, withdrawn. Geschichte (talk) 09:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Lathan[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lathan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only two legitimate entries in the whole disambiguation page: Lathan (name) (the primary topic) and Eas Lathan, so WP:TWODABS applies. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:42, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Standard disambiguation page. The standard automated note at the bottom reads "This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title Lathan." Softlavender (talk) 02:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Valid dab page. "Eas" is Gaelic for "waterfall" (according to Eas Fors), so Eas Lathan is a valid entry for this dab page; some other entries may be a bit iffy but do no harm. PamD 10:54, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Or possibly move to Lathan (disambiguation), and move Lathan (name) to Lathan as primary topic, adding hatnote to point to dab page. PamD 10:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- I already pointed out that the waterfall is the second legit entry. Hatte Lathan, Channay-sur-Lathan and Savigné-sur-Lathan are not, and Lathan is not mentioned in Loire. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:26, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as there at least 3 eligible entries (I've just added a link for the river), and I don't think I see a primary topic. The name list can be merged into the dab, as it's not big enough to warrant a separate page. – Uanfala (talk) 20:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Withdraw nomination. Three is enough. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:14, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.