Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latch (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. SarahStierch (talk) 01:12, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Latch (song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG. No serious coverage, just chart listings as refs etc. CaptainScreebo ^Parley! 19:31, 28 October 2012 (UTC) CaptainScreebo ^Parley! 19:31, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Single charted and received significant coverage. --Michig (talk) 06:40, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak keep - charting is not in itself a reason to keep this article, or meet WP:NMUSIC. But because of the Guardian review and the meaty paragraph in the NYT there may just be enough to sustain a short article. The article will need to be expanded to give more than just chart stats! Sionk (talk) 00:37, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - Song has peaked to number 12 on the UK Singles Chart and has recieved coverage. Greenock125 (talk) 18:00, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:51, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.