Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Last life

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Also, I note that hoax is not a speedy deletion criterion. kur ykh 00:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last life[edit]

Contested prod. Article is about a non-notable book. Google returns exactly one hit for "Last Life" and "Brock Publishing" - this article. TN‑X-Man 15:47, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Hoax, or really really non-notable. The article itself says that "only a few copies exist, as the project was canceled." Heave-ho! Brianyoumans (talk) 16:05, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No claim of notability made by article, no indication of notability found in search, speedy if possible, delete either way. Theseeker4 (talk) 16:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the first line of WP:BOLLOCKS. AlexTiefling (talk) 17:11, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete (G3) — without anything indicating why this may be remarkable in any way (note: does not fall under A7 as this is not a person or web content), I have to call bullshit here. MuZemike (talk) 17:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, notability not established. LinguistAtLarge 17:56, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete whether or not the book exists, there's no way to make an article out of this. JuJube (talk) 18:50, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There's something troubling about this "article". I believe it may be worth preserving in some form or turning over to the authorities in the area where the IP that created it is located. It almost seems threatening except that the names seem fictional. But I guess it's just a healthy fictional excercise on a fictional horror related topic? Well just delete it.ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:41, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 20:17, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SNOW Delete: A non-notable book. If the book does exist, it is self published since the nominator could only find only find Wikipedia in a Google search. I mostly doubt that it exists. Schuym1 (talk) 01:39, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 21:28, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.