Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Last eruption

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last eruption[edit]

The article is completely idiosyncratic. Almost everything on it is incorrect or at least contentious, e.g. see [1], [2] and even volcano for a discussion of what an active or an extinct volcano is. Last eruption refers to the last volcanic event of a volcano - what about bradyseism, increased fumarole activity etc.

But the real problem is the assertion that "The date of last eruption determines the classification of the type of volcano", which is not really true, and so nullifies the whole point of the article and make my attempts to figure out how to fix it not really lead anywhere. Jll 14:28, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unencyclopedic per nom MLA 16:12, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Hopeless. -ikkyu2 (talk) 16:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. The date of last eruption (not the eruption, the date) is an important piece information, but I can't see how it could make its own article. Peter Grey 08:38, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -- Krash (Talk) 17:42, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unencyclopedic. Nigelthefish 14:39, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.