Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laser Diagnostic Instruments

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:45, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Laser Diagnostic Instruments[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advert for obscure Baltic firm, padded with references that are about technologies, violations of WP:NOTCONTAGIOUS. etc. Orange Mike | Talk 12:37, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 14:13, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 14:13, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DeleteThey seem to have engaged as part of various joint efforts and partnerships, but done nothing specifically themselves. as of yet.— Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs)
Delete. No evidence whatsoever of this company's independent notability despite the article being padded with the usual slew of well-formatted non-references typical of paid-for WP articles. The references either don't mention the company at all and are about the technology sector in which it operates, passing mentions, or written by the company itself, misleadingly presented as independent sources—refs 2, 10, and 11 are typical examples. Voceditenore (talk) 08:46, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.