Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lars Mullback

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Does not appear to meet WP:BIO. Nakon 03:33, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lars Mullback[edit]

Lars Mullback (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced (and poorly written) article that appears to be about a non-notable person. Any of the claims don't seem verifiable. Rob Sinden (talk) 12:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 15:07, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - poorly soured and poorly written is not a reason for deletion. AfD is not a clean-up service. per WP:GNG this is a notable article.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:16, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Where's the evidence of notability? --Rob Sinden (talk) 07:57, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:23, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Aside from the fact that one whole section of the article is made up of un-connected clauses (?!), the one non-dead link does not contain any information about him, and even his web site is non-live. The only sites I found about him appear to copy their text from the WP article. LaMona (talk) 19:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Not even minimal coverage. SL93 (talk) 22:55, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
How do you mean?--BabbaQ (talk) 10:11, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
How?--BabbaQ (talk) 10:11, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
How not? --Inother (talk) 20:55, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Yes the article is bad, but that's not a reason to delete. Searching Google News for his name comes up with [1], [2], and [3]. All are from the last few months. The one about the plane crash in particular suggests to me that Swedish readers would know and care about who he is. Would appreciate the perspective of someone in Sweden. Also Swedish Wikipedia does have a page sv:Lars Mullback. Agtx (talk) 04:18, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.