Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Thomas (political advisor)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that the subject meets notability standards. North America1000 02:32, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Larry Thomas (political advisor)[edit]

Larry Thomas (political advisor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Career does not appear notable. Most sources are his own columns; a local obit is not proof of notability DGG ( talk ) 08:56, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:11, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:11, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I created the article. It's a stub, but The Los Angeles Times is a major newspaper...Zigzig20s (talk) 14:46, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The Los Angeles Times is regional, rather than local, and a full obituary therein should be enough to pass WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. A big obituary (looks like 3/4 of a full page) in a big newspaper plus a later LA Times article seem enough to me. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:02, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:44, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 21:11, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per coverage. Clearly a man of significant influence in California politics over the decades. МандичкаYO 😜 18:02, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Sources are reliable and meet coverage. Emily Khine (talk) 19:57, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.